CroteauSchaefer706

Now, there is certainly not anything wrong with this, I only think that writers who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or clients. Such reference boxes will simply gain their site ranks in a... I run a post directory on my site, and I am seeing an increasing number of articles being presented, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is most likely due to the increasing number of PLR articles and material that is becoming available. Today, theres not necessarily something wrong with this, I just think that authors who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or customers. Click here linklicious wiki to compare how to flirt with it. Such reference boxes will only gain their site rankings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine. Is this a bad thing? No. Where theyre losing out can be as follows. Much of the traffic to my post directory comes from search engines, by people looking for information on a particular topic. Today, this user types in their keywords, presses on the search field, and is given a summary of relevant sites. My sister learned about linklicious by browsing the Internet. They selected one, and are taken to the authors article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, feel This is interesting and go to the authors resource field at the end of-the article to see what else theyve to say on this subject. There, they find a link to some site advertising mobile ringtones. May be the reader going to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not so likely. They want to check out snowboarding, maybe not modify their phone. Identify more on the affiliated essay by going to Oddershede Lausten. I believe one of three things may happen then The reader leaves the entire site in disgust. Identify extra info on the affiliated site by clicking linklicious guide. The viewer clicks on a link to a related article. The viewer clicks on a related Google Ad-sense or similar contextual promotion ad. They do not click the authors resource link. Thats a possible client lost, very probably permanently. Yes, put a link in to your website in the source package, but many article directories let several links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in that ;s linked to the article subject also, and ultimately put it in first, before you lose the consumer. But my site does not have any such thing regarding that issue on it Then add something that does. Include a report service, and have the source package saying To read more articles on this subject, go here. Add a web service, and have the written text say To view links to websites with this issue, click the link. Or just go to Click-bank, search for related projects, and have a link to them, with the link saying something such as If you prefer to learn more on this issue, buy this item. Preferably, not a direct connect to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one. Using this method, you still get that url to your website that you were after actually, but, also, youve the chance to generate income from the audience in a new way. A win-win situation. Plus, you do not seem like somebody only distributing purchased information on any subject just for the sake of the backlink it will give you. An infinitely more professional look. Is not it worth taking the time to make greater use of the reference field?.